Another
post concerning Bruckner is here.
On
Saturday, 23 February, a friend and I attended a concert at Bard
College featuring Bruckner's 8th symphony in its original
1887 version, one I'd never heard before. The music was played by
the American Symphony Orchestra, conducted by Leon Botstein in a
stunning performance that I'm pretty sure was not fully appreciated
by most of the audience. After all, how many even of the most
seasoned concert audiences know much if anything about Bruckner?
Anton
Bruckner (1824-1896), the Austrian composer, is noted primarily for
his symphonies and his church music. Johannes Brahms, who did not
seemingly like Bruckner personally, or at least not his work,
referred to Bruckner's “great snakes of symphonies” for they are
all long and snake about both thematically and harmonically, all
within a certain greatly elongated sonata allegro form.
Bruckner wrote eleven symphonies between 1863 and the time of his
death in 1896. His works begin with the Study Symphony in F minor.
He then wrote the uniquely named symphony No. 0 in d minor in 1869,
henceforth the Zero. Thereafter he wrote nine more. his last titled
Symphony No. 9 (although it's really his eleventh) left unfinished at
his death, it's final movement incomplete. Knowing he might not live
long enough to complete this last symphony, Bruckner suggested that
his Te Deum be played as the final movement.
For
much of this music, you will perhaps want to get into a nice
comfortable chair and put on a good set of headphones that can really
take the dynamic ranges, kick your feet up and relax. This is the
kind of music to accompany some great motion picture one might create
in one's mind. Of course another aspect we shall be encountering is
the music that again was being written by residents of Vienna,
leading up to the so called Second Vienna School (Zweite Wiener
Schule, Neue Wiener Schule), this music was to bridge the gap between
the Romantic era and the atonalism of the 20th century.
The chief musical vehicle was the symphony, as it had been for what
some may call the First Vienna School that had formed around Joseph
Haydn, who wrote more symphonies than anyone else.
Study
Symphony in f minor (1863)
[1]
Allegro molto vivace
(There
are a few cuts in this performance, but this is the only version of
this movement on You Tube that comes to a conclusion.)
[2]
Andante molto 7:03
[3]
Scherzo - Schnell 5:25
[4]
Allegro 6:46
Unattributed
but possibly the Royal Scottish National Orchestra (Glasgow)
conducted by Georg Tintner.
At
its writing, the composer was 39 years old. We hear various obvious
steals throughout, from sources as far back as Mozart and Beethoven,
through Mendelssohn and Schumann. But some of what will become the
more pronounced Bruckner style are already present. This is most
definitely an under rated symphony which should be performed more
often as a good opener in a programme paired perhaps with a 20th
century masterpiece or two for the second half of a concert. The
work lasts about three quarters of an hour and will fully exercise
all capabilities of a large symphony orchestra.
1.
Allegro
2.
Andante
3.
Scherzo: Presto — Trio: Langsamer und ruhiger
4. Finale:
Moderato — Allegro vivace
Sir
George Solti conducts the Chicago Symphony Orchestra
The
Zero lasts almost 40 minutes and might actually be Bruckner's third
in order of composition. The next one, the official 1st
symphony, was written three years earlier and this one could have
been at least begun the same year. In any case Bruckner is 45 at its
completion. From the standpoint of the previous Study Symphony, it
would seem that Bruckner fashioned two symphonies, one he rejected,
the Zero, whilst the other became the official beginning of his
legacy. Amazing that many, perhaps most just neglect these works as
useless. The only problem with discarding them is that these first
two symphonies each contain a lot of musical material, some of
extraordinary value considering who might have been looking, or
listening. But no one really was. Is it then a coincidence that
certain weird little orchestral textures found in these works turn up
in works by later composers? We'll probably never know. Suffice it
to say that certain ideas seem to have currency and draw their own
admirers during their own particular times. This symphony is also
quite full of steals. But one must after all learn from someone.
The cult of overt individualism is certainly overrated. As it is,
much in these early symphonies already peculiar to Bruckner's style,
will definitely influence Mahler and of course the unfortunate Hans
Rott, as well as others. It has been often said that
musically, Bruckner owes the most to Wagner, but how differently did
each employ similar orchestral ideas? Both composers wrote music
that is large and expresses many aspects of raw natural power, as
well as suggesting natural elements, creatures in a forest, but
perhaps only accidentally. Else we are liable to accept that
Bruckner, who had studied counterpoint extensively for many years,
was using his symphonies to plumb the mysteries of orchestral music
as an exercise in sheer intellectual study; one of the elements in
the Quadrivium is Music. Everything we know of the studied and
studious nature of Bruckner suggests that this might even have been
exactly his intentions.
Symphony No.1 in C minor (1868) "das kecke
Beserl"
1.
Allegro (C minor)
2.
Adagio (A-flat major)
3.
Scherzo: Lebhaft (G minor) – Trio: Langsam (G major)
4.
Finale: Bewegt und feurig (C minor)
Sir
Geg Solti conducts the Chicago Symphony Orchestra.
Though
complete after a fashion in 1868, he revised it until 1891, dedicated
it to the University of Vienna, in the main completed before he
completed the Zero, this work provides ample evidence that very much
of what Bruckner would accomplish was already fully alive in this
work. The amazing and revealing steals also continue, from various
sources, a few known, like Beethoven and Wagner, while other steals
are more obscure. But from the opening bars of the first movement,
we are aware of the similarity with the opening of Mahler's 6th,
so in music as everywhere else, stealing occurs frequently. But of
course we are of a mind not to be terribly concerned with various
ways composers plagiarize ideas from each other because we recognize
that they were in their way in this way, not so much stealing as
paying the purloined from composer a sincere compliment. Bruckner's
symphonies are replete with references to certain elements in
Wagner's style while not deliberately quoting passages from specific
works. It is well known that Bruckner paid deliberate tribute to
Wagner, and that's putting it mildly.
Symphony No. 2 in c minor (1872)
1.
Moderato, (C minor)
2.
Feierlich, etwas bewegt, (A-flat major)
3.
Scherzo: Mäßig schnell, (C minor) - Trio: Gleiches Tempo, (C
major)
4.
Finale: Ziemlich schnell, (C minor)
Riccardo
Muti conducts the Wiener Philharmoniker at a live concert in the Musikverein,
Vienna, 13 April, 2008. (1877 version where the 2nd and
3rd movements are reversed from the original versions)
Revised
and reworked until it was published in 1892, this is a fleet work in
some respects compared with its predecessor, with again plenty in it
that will be picked over by Mahler for ideas that in his hands would
sound quite different. Bruckner, as is customarily conceived, was
concerned with evoking nature as a tribute to nature's creator, since
Bruckner was never far from his apparently quite fervent religious
devotion. What may be Bruckner's case, as well or even instead, is
that he was primarily a composer operating in the ways mathematicians
are devoted to mathematics in that his works are themselves immense
“studies” intended to do exactly what they accomplished in the
case of Mahler and others, who would apparently learn much from
Bruckner's efforts.
Symphony No.3 in d minor, “Wagner” (original 1873 version)
1.
Gemäßigt, mehr bewegt, misterioso (also Sehr langsam,
misterioso)—d minor
2.
Adagio. Bewegt, quasi Andante—E-flat major
3.
Scherzo. Ziemlich schnell (also Sehr schnell)—d minor
4.
Finale. Allegro (also Ziemlich schnell)—d minor
Yannick
Nézet-Séguin conducting the Staatskapelle Dresden at a concert in
the Semperoper, Dresden, Germany on 22 September, 2008.
The
first movement is dominated by an enigmatic figure that dramatically
pops up amid otherwise passages suggesting natural surroundings.
Much else goes on as well. This work was dedicated to Richard
Wagner. In the dedication, Bruckner wrote of Wagner as "the
unreachable world-famous noble master of poetry and music."
Flattery got one best wishes from the cantankerous old composer.
Money of course got them Wagner's blessings and later perhaps a
personal stab in the back. The imperturbably innocent Bruckner
hadn't either vanity or money, so probably Wagner's best wishes were
a gentle “what possible harm could he do?” kind of brush off. In
any case Bruckner might have been warned that Wagner was usually a
dangerous friend.
The
music itself is almost the perfect bridge between Beethoven (and even
Haydn) and Mahler, through the lens of Wagner. The second movement
is where classical Vienna meets the unanswerable questions from
Tristan und Isolde. Of course that work dates from before
1860 and now 13 years later, the nearly 50 year old Bruckner writes
this music. The difference between Wagner and Bruckner is in the
ground of their mysticism. Bruckner's is sacred, whilst Wagner's is
profane. Wagner believed in nobody but himself, while Bruckner
believed he was merely another of God's creatures, a comparative
nobody. The difference in their music and how it relates to the
Messianic and redemptive strains in Mahler are all found here.
Played competently, and yes, with all the real references directly
back to Haydn, this movement become the musical apotheosis of the
Viennese (and late German Romantic) culture of that period, when
matters of honour and heroism were familiar to all.
This
Scherzo is going to be a kind of model for other dance music in the
symphonies that would follow. Bruckner is pairing brutal and brusque
musical figures with candid fleet footedness and again the sense that
one could take the tone centre of the music anywhere at all at any
moment. If you like Mahler, hear this trio and you will have no
doubt of the inspiration. But this is Bruckner, so there is ease and
unmarred happiness instead of strain and pain.
The
finale is in d minor, titanic and flexed. Played as it is here, it
really shows off the full capabilities of a great orchestra. Where
did Bruckner get some of this? Oh, from Schubert, from other prosaic
composers of schmaltzy dance music of the period, out of his
counterpoint books. The part writing and how it all stands out as
distinct and weaves itself together flawlessly are demonstrated as
casually as having a walk (or ride) through the country. There is
even a place where the music seems to pause and take a little rest,
then resumes. Bruckner doesn't let you linger too long ; he just
keeps the walk (ride) going where it naturally would if it were ...
out of that particular place in space and time that was the late 19th
century in Vienna, thirty years and another lifetime ahead of the
Great War. The huge clouds of noise he gets up in this symphony
never sound as if they are quite the premonition of a great war, but
rather of some dramatic weather or natural event or some possible
beneficent act of the Almighty. Nevertheless, to Anton Bruckner,
these may have in fact been nothing more than great music lessons
writ large. Did he mock himself even near the end of this last
movement? It's certainly possible.
Symphony No.4 in E flat major, "Die Romantische"
(1874-1888)
1.
Bewegt, nicht zu schnell (E-flat major)
2.
Andante, quasi allegretto (C minor)
3.
Scherzo. Bewegt - Trio: Nicht zu schnell (B-flat major)
4.
Finale: Bewegt, doch nicht zu schnell (E-flat major)
Daniel
Barenboim conducting Wiener Philharmonier,
Royal Albert Hall,
London, 3 9 / 2007
The
Romantic symphony is one of Bruckner's best known, premiered in 1881
by Hans Richter in Vienna with great success. Bruckner used the name
Romantic for this work to depict heroic tales rather than love
stories. Wagner gave this work his personal approval, which I'm sure
helped secure the work both publicity and performances.
Symphony No 5 in B flat Major
(1875-1876)
1.
Introduction (Adagio) — Allegro. B-flat major.
2.
Adagio. Sehr langsam. D minor.
3.
Scherzo. Molto vivace D minor.
4.
Finale (Adagio) — Allegro moderato. B-flat major.
Nikolaus
Harnoncourt conducting Wiener Philharmoniker
Festspielhaus,
Salzburg, 28 8 / 2005
First performed in completed form in
1887 (published in 1897), a performance capable of lasting an hour
and a half! this work is yet of a more straightforward and simpler
design than those which follow it, and many of the devices used are
hence perhaps more memorable. There is a lot of string plucking;
pizzicato, throughout this work. Bruckner uses the slow walking
theme of the academic sounding introduction to the first movement for
material to add to the development section. The effect might seem
heroic and pastoral by turns. Here again, as we have and will see,
vast orchestral walls succeed one another with really masterful
applications of Wagnerian orchestration as if the orchestra is played
as a vast organ, that being Bruckner's principle instrument.
The
second movement features possibly more bucolic passages, but these
would likely be vistas framed by huge glaciated fastnesses, not your
usual placid hills and valleys back home. He tries birhymicality
over a few measures and repeats it later in the form's rebound so you
know he's serious. Here and there an odd phrase will remind you of
Elgar.
Bruckner
essays many more daring things in the Scherzo, which especially in
the Trio sounds like Mahler, who always claimed Bruckner as
inspiration. Nobody writes in a vacuum.
The
Finale begins as did the first movement, the same stately academic
walk, but then successive themes from the first movement are tried
until a new theme is taken up in a fugue. This one certainly gets
inspiration from Beethoven's Große Fuge. But then Bruckner breaks
free of it into more of his usual symphonic strands, more string
plucking giving that “urban” quality to many of the passages.
But then there are the brass choirs signifying something more like
attending high mass, which in Catholic Austria was almost a token of
patriotism to the Hapsburg regime and the realm it signified. As
with much in Bruckner, it's not over til it's over and you will feel
a few false ends before it all comes to the usual colossal finish.
What do you expect from someone that uses a fugue as the substitute
for the first subject in a sonata allegro form?
Symphony No 6 in A Major
(1879-1881)
1.
Majestoso
2. Adagio. Sehr feierlich
3. Scherzo. Nicht
schnell — Trio. Langsam
4. Finale. Bewegt, doch nicht zu
schnell
Christoph
Eschenbach conducts the Wiener Philharmoniker in the Musikverein,
Vienna, in a live performance, 10 December, 2008.
He's in
his mid fifties as he writes this, perhaps the least well known of
Bruckner's symphonies, and for that reason it will probably over time
become better known. It lasts the regulation hour in length, and
contains many exquisite touches and stunning orchestral effects. The
first movement, Majestoso, presents us with thematic material and
contexts which cannot set for us any definite key, the second
movement is actually in sonata form, the third movement predates the
scherzo in his 8th symphony, the finale almost a symphony
in itself.
Symphony No 7 in E Major
(1881-1882)
1.
Allegro moderato (E major)
2. Adagio. Sehr feierlich und sehr
langsam (C-sharp minor)
3. Scherzo. Sehr schnell (A minor)
4.
Finale. Bewegt, doch nicht schnell (E major)
Bernard
Haitink conducts the Staatskapelle Dresden in the Royal Albert Hall,
London in a live performance, 9 March, 2004. This is one for
headphones as some of the playing is really gorgeous.
This
symphony, which runs a little more than an hour, won Bruckner his
greatest public success during his lifetime, and why not? It's one
of the tighter of his conceptions for one thing, and his
orchestration is at its best. Bruckner is as some suppose imitating
nature. But it could as well be that he is writing pure music as
much of it has geometric progression, structure and substance, of
course drawn from Wagner, but put to far different uses. Much of it
also sounds like early Mahler, who would be deeply influenced by this
music. Other trademarks of Bruckner's style are his occasional
references to phrase painting from the First Vienna School, because
after all he is in Vienna and has inherited their craft. This piece
was being written in that fateful year, 1881, that would see the
première of Brahms' second piano concerto and the birth of Béla
Bartók. It was first performed in 1884 and revised in 1885.
Symphony No. 8 in c minor (original version, 1887)
1. Allegro moderato
2. Scherzo. Allegro moderato; Trio. Langsam
3. Adagio. Feierlich langsam, doch nicht schleppend
4. Finale. Feierlich, nicht schnell
Vladimir
Fedoseyev conducts the Moscow Radio Symphony Orchestra.
Most
have heard this in later versions that Bruckner should never have
allowed to be edited. This is the way he originally heard and wrote
it. Much of it comes across as more original and better integrated
and some of the music, notably in the Third movement, is totally
different.
Symphony No. 9 in d minor (incomplete in 1896)
1.
Feierlich, misterioso
2.
Scherzo. Bewegt, lebhaft - Trio. Schnell
3.
Adagio. Langsam, feierlich
Bernard
Haitink conducts the Chicago Symphony Orchestra in a live concert at
Orchestra Hall, Chicago, 14 November, 2009.
The
culmination of all Bruckner's symphonic output was this enigmatic
music that somehow crystallized his unique style. Most will never
hear more than these three movements and for most they will always be
more than enough. But This symphony had sketches for the usual
fourth movement and a story goes that Bruckner, realizing that he
would not complete this work before his death, suggested that his Te
Deum be played as its finale. The English composer, Robert Simpson,
among many disputed this, but we are including the Te Deum here
anyway as in fact a very fitting way to complete this last of
Bruckner's symphonies.
Te Deum in C major (1884)
1.
"Te Deum laudamus" - Allegro, Feierlich, mit Kraft, common
time, C major
2.
"Te ergo quaesumus" - Moderato, common time, F minor
3.
"Aeterna fac" - Allegro, Feierlich, mit Kraft, common
time, D minor
4.
"Salvum fac populum tuum" - Moderato, common time, F minor
5.
"In Te, Domine speravi" - Mäßig bewegt, common time, C
major
Soprano:
Krassimira Stoyanova
Mezzo-soprano:
Yvonne Naef
Tenor:
Christoph Strehl
Bass:
Günther Groissböck
Chor
des Bayerischen Rundfunks
Chorus
Master: Simon Halsey
Bernard
Haitink conducting the Symphonieorchester des Bayerischen Rundfunks
in a live concert in the Herkulessaal, München, 12 November, 2010.
This
final set of works, the 9th symphony and Te Deum are works
both dedicated to God, Bruckner's very Roman Catholic God. This is
in a way a redux of Beethoven's 9th and Missa solemnis in
D major, Op. 123, itself a monumental and quite dramatic setting of
the Catholic mass. Bruckner's music harkens back to those times in
an earlier Vienna.
The parts that remained in Bruckner's
music from that earlier period also reflected the continuity of
culture, society and governance that would be broken apart within
twenty years of Bruckner's death. But what we have of Bruckner's
music today is a tribute to the vastness and uniqueness of his
conceptions within the dynamic framework of personalities as diverse
as Wagner and Bach; such are the complexities of his musical steals.
Someone who would learn from Bruckner, or at least his
pupils, would be the young American composer, Charles Ives, whose
first two symphonies are full of clever steals. During the same
period we have many American symphonists, known these days as the New
England School (academics are so very fond of attributing some
artistic and stylistic genres to the term “school”), whose
methods were essentially the same as Bruckner's. But though these
composers had a small staunch following among certain classes of
Bostonians, their popularity and influence was short lived as the
Great War and the Jazz Age would change all of that
forever.
Thank-you so very much for spending a little time
investigating the fascinating though often neglected musical world of
Anton Bruckner.
FINIS